Actor Charlie Sheen Questions Official 9/11 Story
Just when you thought it couldn’t get any worse than Navy Seals… I saw this headline on WNYMedia.net (originally posted on PrisonPlanet.com) and I was hoping it was going to link me to a satirical story about another Hollywood actor-turned-omniscient. Unfortunately, there was no satire to be found, it was serious. Made me feel bad that WNYMedia.net, which I love for it’s local coverage, gets sucked into this tabloid-type garbage.
The whole thing is just too long to quote here, but Sheen basically reiterates every whacko nut job conspiracy theory in existence about 9/11 – that the twin towers were demolished from the inside, that there were “rehearsal” images of planes hitting the building, that a missile was shot at the Pentagon.
Unfortunately for Sheen, this article is the funniest thing he’s said in years.
Wake up! Arise from your slumber. Tabloid? There are some very real questions that need to be answered.
Popular Mechanics debunks the myths
The popular mechanics article is whats known as yellow journalism. The same people who own PM, Hearst Corporation, started a war with Spain in 1911 or lies they reported. Why don’t we analyze the PM article.
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/gopm/index.html
The biggest unanswered question regarding 9/11 remains the complete symetrical collapse of World Trade Center 7. So far the only official explanation for it admits its highly unlikely and needs further investigation
“The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue.” (FEMA, 2002, chapter 5;)
I suggest to the people just learning about this to research the collapse of WTC 7. People like Rightwinged.com only attack and insult people who believe this and completely ignore all the information that supports our hypothesis. The collapse of WTC Building 7 defies the laws of physics acording to the people that call us “moonbats”. However arguing that terrorists can break the laws of physics is far more “moonbat” than anything we are saying. I challenge people who disagree to think critically. We are not some small crazy group. Just look at the poll at CNN.
http://wtc7.net/contents.html
Really, right away when someone speaks out there life is all people can bring up. This nation is a bunch of O’Riellys. Sheen isn’t they holiest guy to be a spokesman, sure he basically lived a life every man dreams of. But the reality is he is a human who has access to a life like that. You may say the theory’s have all been debunked un officially. All sheen asked is he wanted an Official investigation in to the matter that doesn’t have a comity of bias in the matter. If you buy the Official 9/11 Commission report that is your choice. (most people comment on it and haven’t even read it) It just doesn’t add up. What’s so hard of a True Citizen of this US asking to re-investigating one of the biggest events in the past 200 years. If there is nothing to hide there should be no harm done. If you realize and can come to the agreement 9/11 changed life as we know it. I myself at the time caught up in in the hype of patriotism believed everything I was told. I do believe I was quoted to say “were do I sign up to get those F’n Afangies”. I started reading about this issue and others and then I start to doubt what was being said. Like most people, its hard to face reality even when its slammed in your face. You just don’t want to believe, to believe is un patriotic. Though I still don’t believe in everything the theorist say. I do believe as in Sheen, everything surrounding that day sound too fishy to be true. Too many strange stuff happened that the Government refuses to explain. All Sheen and most of US want is the truth. Not some right wing left wing explanation. No politics just the truth. I stand behind Sheen with his views on this topic. As unearthly as this event is to the history of the US we need to get the real truth. Recently I just started listing to Alex’s show and I have to admit he is a bit out there at first, but if you listen to him he is just a News reader. He just reads the news others write. He basis his info on facts easily confirmed by searching them down, he even tells you to do this. It’s a rarity he does investigative reporting unless he’s doing a documentary. In my book this are examples of true Americans. Willing to risk everything not for fame but for freedom. Like every man and women who fight for this country. All they as of you is educate yourself, be it through them or on your own. Realize you can ignore them at any time. But when the truth hits you, you and only you will have to face your beliefs.
Don’t want to sound stupid here but I’d like to say Charlie Sheen and Alex Jones I salute you as one American to another.
Popular Mechanics Attacks Its
“9/11 LIES” Straw Man
by Jim Hoffman
Version 1.2, February 9, 2005
The Hearst-owned Popular Mechanics magazine takes aim at the 9/11 Truth Movement (without ever acknowledging it by that name) with a cover story in its March 2005 edition. Sandwiched between ads and features for monster trucks, NASCAR paraphernalia, and off-road racing are twelve dense and brilliantly designed pages purporting to debunk the myths of 9/11.
The article’s approach is to identify and attack a series of claims which it asserts represent the whole of 9/11 skepticism. It gives the false impression that these claims, several of which are clearly absurd, represent the breadth of challenges to the official account of the flights, the World Trade Center attack, and the Pentagon attack. Meanwhile it entirely ignores vast bodies of evidence showing that only insiders had the means, motive, and opportunity to carry out the attack.
Read the rest of the article here:
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pm/
P.S. Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff’s 25-year old cousin, Benjamin Chertoff, penned the Popular Mechanics piece on 9/11 sceptics. This is a represents a huge conflict of interest.
Do your own research.
Watch this video and tell me it does not raise some questions:
“9/11 Revisited: Were explosives used?”Â
http://youtube.com/watch?v=psP_9RE0V2I
Watch the video of this speech wich origionally aired on C-Span:
The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions
David Ray Griffin
Description: David Ray Griffin takes a critical look at the official 9/11 Commission Report. Professor Griffin argues that “omissions and distortions” in the report amount to a cover-up by government officials and says that the available evidence suggests that the Bush administration was complicit in the 9/11 attacks. Professor Griffin covers topics he says have been inadequately answered by the commission. These include questions surrounding the attack on the Pentagon, the way in which the World Trade Center towers collapsed, and the behavior of President Bush and his Secret Service detail following notification that a second plane had hit the WTC. The talk was hosted by the Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth (www.mujca.com) and took place at the University of Wisconsin in Madison. Includes Q&A.
Author Bio: David Ray Griffin is professor emeritus at the Claremont School of Theology, where he taught for over 30 years (retiring in 2004). He has authored or edited over two dozen books, including “God and Religion in the Postmodern World,” “Religion and Scientific Naturalism,” and “The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11.”
http://www.911blogger.com/2005/04/proper-release-of-griffin-in-madison.html
MIT Engineer Explains WTC Controlled Demolition:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1822764959599063248
Sheen Challenge to Media
I dare you to print this email in it’s entirety …
RELATED:
Video From Charlie Sheen’s brave first interview on the Alex Jones Show:
Or Listen to the Interview Here
The mere fact that you did a cut and paste job of the slanderous and idiotic Marine Hyde London Journal piece, speaks volumes about your credibility as a major media entity.
Like so many other mainstream outlets, domestically and abroad, no attention whatsoever is given to the questions I raise or the evidence that stimulated those very questions.
Instead, low-brow idiotic hit pieces are spewed forth in an effort to sway the readers’ opinion of the messenger while blatantly disregarding any of the potentially valuable content of the story. It’s transparent sandbox propaganda as dated and cheap as the paper it’s printed on.
Do a little research on Building Seven. Building Seven lives at the epicenter of my entire debate. Prove yourself worthy of genuine investigative journalism. Look at the video evidence.
Observe the same data I have. Submit a formal request to the Pentagon or the DOD to release video PROOF that flight 77 did exactly as they claim. You will be stonewalled. You will be dismissed unconditionally. If there is nothing to hide – why are they hiding it?
To avoid any confusion – I reiterate:
Building Seven – Pentagon video documentation.
If any portion, or portions of this text is any way deleted or manipulated, you will only confirm what myself and countless others have suspected all along: Media complicity with no interest in the truth.
A CNN poll at the time of this writing currently sits at 84 percent IN SUPPORT of my views.
Say what you must about me – it means nothing.
Yet, if you continue to overlook the hard questions and physical evidence regarding 9/11 – you only confirm what so many of us “Conspiracy Idiots” have suspected all along – The Official Report is, at best, an insulting work of FICTION.
I would like to thank everyone for posting their opposing viewpoints on this issue. As you all can see, I gave more than equal time to the opposite side of the argument. I only disallowed comments posted from obviously fake email addresses. However, I can assure all of you that people don’t read my site for conspiracy theory debate, so your time may be better spent fighting your battle elsewhere. 🙂
Look at the message not the messenger.
I’ve set up a site at BravoCharlie911.com
The intent is to give Charlie Sheen the support he so deserves, and in all likelyhood could probably use right about now. It’s also hoped that the sentiments and suppoert expressed there will encourage others to step into the light as well. Pop by and leave a note of support. There’s also a retty comprehensive list of investigative sites you can take a look at. Make up your own mind.